High Country History Group

Greensted, Stanford Rivers, Stapleford Tawney & Theydon Mount
established 1999
Journal No. 57

Journal No. 57

Contents

Article 1 of 13

Ongar’s First War Memorial

Regarding ‘Ongar’s First War Memorial’, it seems that the town was not alone in commemorating those of the Great War. At Stondon Massey, the Revd. Edward Reeve wrote in his ‘Notes for a Parish History’: 14 August 1918.
“A Roll of Honour, including all men who have joined from the Parish since 1914 has been framed and placed in the Church”.

Andrew Smith

Article 2 of 13

Leverton Charities, Waltham Abbey

I read the article on Leverton Charities, Waltham Abbey, in the High Country History Group Journal (June 2015), with considerable interest. As President of Waltham Abbey History Society, I gave a lecture on Thomas Leverton and George Fawbert several years ago and was aware of much of your information.

George Fawbert (1756-1824) came to Essex from Yorkshire and seems to have been at Burnt Mill, Netteswell, before moving to Waltham Abbey where he traded as a victualler from about 1794. He moved several times and spent his last years at Cheshunt, where he died on 22nd April, 1824. Although a memorial slab in Waltham Abbey records him and his wife, Sarah, he was apparently not buried there, although Sarah was.

The executors of his Will were Thomas Augustus Jessopp and John Barnard, a maltster of Harlow. After paying various legacies to relatives - he and his wife left no children - the executors purchased a property in Waltham Abbey for the Leverton School, as you state.

Sarah Fawbert, the widow, died on 19th April, 1828, and also left a Will, naming several beneficiaries including James Bell, maltster of Harlow, her husband's nephew.

Thomas Augustus Jessopp died leaving John Barnard as the sole executor of George Fawbert's Will to distribute the remaining funds, and this was unsuccessfully contested in H.M. High Court of Chancery by James Bell.

As a result, £8,000 was transferred to John Barnard (maltster of Harlow), William Barnard (maltster of Sawbridgeworth), Richard Barnard (miller), and William Barnard (farmer) to establish a charity "for the express object and purpose in the first place of forming and maintaining a weekday school for the education of children of both sexes". The school was built with two classrooms in Harlow and opened on 20th April, 1836, as Fawbert & Barnard Charity. My wife has been a governor of the school for over forty years, chairing the governing body for more than half that period. The full name of the school is Fawbert & Barnard's (Undenominational) Primary School. From the outset, it was laid down that no child could be excluded on religious grounds.

A similar school was established as Fawbert & Barnard Charity in Sawbridgeworth in 1839 and this, too, is still flourishing.

All good wishes.

Stan Newens.

Article 3 of 13

Ongar and District Cottage Hospital, 1928-1939

During the Great War temporary Red Cross convalescent hospitals were established in the Ongar area. Blake Hall, Bobbingworth, was used by officers, whilst the Budworth Hall, Ongar, was used for other ranks. The workhouse infirmary at Stanford Rivers also took in 10 convalescent soldiers ‘in pale blue uniforms’ during the war.

In December 1918 a public meeting was held at Ongar, during which it was decided to build a cottage hospital to commemorate those who had given their lives during the Great War and to celebrate the peace. A local G.P., Dr G.R. Wilson was actively involved in this. However it would be another 10 years before a site in Shelley was purchased, the money needed having taken this long to collect.

However another G.P., Dr Henry Charles Couts Hackney and ‘a few local gentlemen’ acted unilaterally and opened the Ongar and District Cottage Hospital in September 1928. It was to be mainly financed by annual subscribers, individual donations, various benevolent societies and the Hospitals Savings Association. A bungalow was rented and adapted to take 6 beds and an operating theatre.

Soon after ‘owing to the long list of sufferers seeking admission,’ the adjoining semi-detached bungalow was added, providing a further 8 beds and accommodation for nursing staff. In September 1930, a nearby house was rented for the use of nursing staff and the space used by them in the bungalow was adapted for the use of out-patients. A further house was rented in 1932 for use as hospital annexe, increasing the in-patient beds to 22 and 2 cots.

The nearby Ongar War Memorial Hospital was opened in 1932, but Dr Hackney refused to become involved with it (his practice already provided care to most of the patients in the area.

Dr Hackney led an interesting life. In January 1940, he was fined £10 at Epping Magistrates Court, for wearing the uniform of a Major in the British Army.
He was arrested in January 1941 for failing to attend court to answer charges of ‘communicating information useful to an enemy.’
At this time he was described as being 57 years of age and living at The Auberies, Blackmore. He was subsequently committed to stand trial at the Assizes.

Dr Hackney, described as a chronic alcoholic, was again arrested in May 1944, and imprisoned for 15 months for issuing forged cheques stolen from one of his patients. He was struck off the Medical Register but his name was restored in December 1950. In 1951 he was employed as a casualty surgeon at the Royal Portsmouth Hospital, but in July of that year he was again convicted of obtaining money under fraudulent pretences and imprisoned for nine months. His name was again removed from the Register.

The story of the hospital and Dr Hackney is based on an article by Michael Leach in the ‘Aspects of Ongar’ and various newspaper articles.

I am indebted to Michael for additional information he has supplied regarding Dr Hackney.

Source Notes:

Hackney served as a Major in the RAMC during WWI, retiring in 1926.
He was disqualified in 1939 for 12 months for a drink driving offence.
The patient was a Hilda Harding from Toot Hill.

Article 4 of 13

A Guide to St Martin’s Church, Ongar

Where in Ongar would you go to find a connection between the Suffragette movement, Oliver Cromwell and Boodles Gentlemen’s Club in London? No this is not a question from the quiz show Only Connect – the answer: they all have connections with the parish church of St Martin in Ongar.

The Ongar Millennium History Society has just published the first complete guide to the church in over 1100 years. Written by Keith Snow with the assistance of Stan Ball and Dr. Michael Leach, this 28 page guide will take you on a journey around the church and churchyard. The authors are to be congratulated on the research and effort that has gone into producing a fascinating insight into ur heritage. It is beautifully illustrated throughout with many colour photographs.

And the answers to my question at the beginning. Well why not buy the booklet, which is very reasonably priced at £3 and find out the answers for yourself!

Article 5 of 13

More about the Petres of Stanford Rivers

In the June 2015 edition of the High Country Journal, Martyn Lockwood wrote a summary of the Petre family’s association with Stanford Rivers. One paragraph refers to a dispute – which ended up in the Chancery court – between Lady Mary Petre and a farmer called William Keep over the custody of the young heir, John Petre. This article looks at the human story behind the legal facts.

The Petres were a well-known Essex landowning family based at Writtle Park and Ingatestone Hall. They remained staunch Roman Catholics throughout the religious turmoils of the 16th and 17th centuries. When William Petre – a younger son of the main branch – was given the manor of Stanford Rivers in 1628, he chose to live there with his wife Lucy in a mansion called Bellhouse. It appears on a map of 1777 about halfway between Murrells and the Old Rectory, approached by two avenues of trees, one leading to Murrells and the other down to the main road opposite the Woodman.
Sir William’s son, also William Petre (1666-1728), and his wife Penelope were so keen to support the Catholic cause that six of their daughters became nuns in France and Belgium, and two of their sons became Catholic priests, leaving the eldest, yet another William, as the heir, and the youngest, Edward, as the ‘spare’. The story of these two sons and both their families is one of romance, religion, kidnap and tragedy.

The Keeps and the Petres

In 1725, a yeoman farmer called William Keep leased the 211-acre farm and farmhouse of Stanford [Rivers] Hall from the old Lord Petre (the one with all the nuns and priests as children), at an annual rent of £130. Several of the farm buildings, it was later alleged, were 'out of repair' due to neglect. The main barn in particular was said to have been 'ruinous and…ought to be pulled down'. Lord Petre had promised to rebuild it but never actually did. It wasn't that the estate was short of money, because three years earlier Lord Petre's eldest son William had married a wealthy heiress, Lady Mary Tudor Radcliffe, daughter of the Earl of Derwentwater. She had brought with her a dowry of no less than £4,000. In 1728, the old Lord Petre died and William inherited, but for some reason his much younger brother Edward, though only 23, was appointed as their father's executor. Sir William and Lady Mary had two children, a girl and a boy, but both died young and there seem to have been no further pregnancies. This was always worrying for landowning families, who wanted to ensure the succession. Hopes were resting on Edward, the only brother who wasn't a celibate priest, to marry a good Catholic girl and produce at least one healthy son.

Edward and Sarah

In November 1735 Edward married Sarah Keep. This ought to have been a cause for family celebration, but it probably wasn't – the young bride was one of the three daughters of their grumbling tenant farmer William Keep of Stanford Hall. Not only was she just a farmer's daughter, socially far below Edward, she was also a Protestant, not a Catholic – her father and grandfather had both been churchwardens of St Margaret’s. There was something of an age gap between Edward and Sarah. He was 30 and she had only just turned 19, but this was not necessarily unusual. The wedding took place in London by licence, at St Andrew's-by-the-Wardrobe, rather than locally. This would have avoided the need to call the banns in St Margaret’s. Did they secretly elope like Romeo and Juliet in a romantic love-match? Was it a shotgun wedding? Or both?

At some time in 1736 (the Petre records are uniquely silent on the exact date), Sarah gave birth to a son Edward, but he died as a baby. In July 1737 a healthy son John, the longed-for heir, was born, followed a year later by a daughter Sarah. The couple also had a fourth child Penelope, who died as a baby in 1742. That same year of 1742, more shockingly, their father Edward Petre died. He was only 37 and had made a very brief last-minute will: 'To my wife Sarah Petre all my estate whatsoever, except my silver watch which I give to William Keep of Stanford Hall, gent, and 3 guineas to my friend Frederick Hartcup.' He was described as 'Edward Petre of Chipping Ongar, gent'. They had evidently lived in Ongar during their brief time together, and Edward seems to have had some affection and respect for his father-in-law. He didn’t even mention any of his Bellhouse relations.

Sarah was supposed to execute his will but never actually did so and she died herself in January 1745, at just 28. The orphaned children, John and Sarah, were placed in the guardianship of their grandfather William Keep. Later that same year their childless uncle, Sir William Petre of Bellhouse, also died, leaving the eight-year-old John as heir to the title and the Bellhouse estates. John thus became his own grandfather's landlord.

Lady Mary v William Keep

The widowed Lady Mary was definitely not a woman to allow the next Lord Petre and his sister to be brought up in a mere farmhouse by Protestants whom she despised. So she 'got into possession and secreted' young John, 'with intent to breed him up a Roman Catholic' according to the court case which followed. She was ordered by the court to disclose his whereabouts. She refused, saying that the Petre family was Roman Catholic and that William Keep was unable to keep John 'in the manner accustomed'. It emerged later that she had secretly sent John to the Catholic college in Douai. Sarah, however, had not been sent to France and was still with Lady Mary at Bellhouse. She was ordered to return Sarah to William Keep and receivers were appointed to administer the estate.

Nearly ten years later, when John would have been 18 or 19, William Keep pursued Lady Mary in Chancery again. He described himself as 'only a Farmer in the Country [who] rents part of…John Petre's estate', who paid his rent regularly and had been 'very much Incumbered by keeping his Granddaughter Sarah'. He had never been able to find out where John was, 'so as to get at the Custody of him, or to have any allowances' for his maintenance which he believed would have included an allowance for his sister's maintenance too. He complained at the cost of the hearing, the legal fees for passing the receiver's accounts, and ended by stating that it 'can't be discovered where John is concealed' and that he was 'supposed to be in some of the Popish Countrys'.

Obviously thoroughly disgruntled, William also complained about the cost of his farm buildings at Stanford Hall. He produced an affidavit from John Archer, a prosperous landowner from Coopersale, who confirmed the former ruinous state of the barn through neglect and the late Lord Petre's broken promise to rebuild it. He stated in 1755 that the barn had recently been wholly taken down and rebuilt, using the old materials. (The barn survives, converted to a house, and has the date 1752 carved on one of the main posts, confirming Mr Archer’s statement. Many of the timbers are visibly re-used.) Other buildings and fences had also been repaired where 'absolutely necessary', the total cost to Keep being £211 15s 2d, which Archer considered reasonable. The hard-pressed William Keep was evidently trying to recoup some of his costs from the Petre estate. The outcome of the case, though, is not known.

John and Frances

The following March Lady Mary died, leaving 'all the family pictures' at Bellhouse to her young nephew John. He must have returned from France around this time or soon after, because in early 1760 he married Frances Manby, daughter of a good Catholic family from South Weald and Pilgrims Hatch. Lady Mary’s scheme to ‘breed him up a Roman Catholic’ had worked. By then he was 22, so his grandfather's guardianship (with potential allowances) had lapsed. Poor old William Keep, by now 77 and a widower, died a few months later and was buried in Stanford Rivers churchyard. The parish register described him as a yeoman rather than a gentleman, as he was called by his son-in-law.

John and Frances had less than three years of married life together at Bellhouse, because at the age of 25 John also died, leaving a daughter Catherine but no male heir. The Bellhouse estate had to be administered by a steward or agent. John’s widow, Frances, his sister Sarah and his daughter Catherine were all entitled to draw generous sums from the estate, which often didn’t generate enough income to cover its costs. By 1819, mounting debts forced the later Petres to sell the Bellhouse estate to the Smiths of Suttons in Stapleford Tawney, and the mansion was pulled down in about 1840.

For nearly 200 years the Petre family and the Bellhouse estate had dominated Stanford Rivers, but falling in love with the ‘wrong’ girl and a series of early deaths eventually led this branch of the Petres, and its link with Stanford Rivers, to die out.

Source Notes:

The pedigree of the Petres of Bellhouse can be found in Roman Catholic Families of England, by J Jackson Howard and H Farnham Burke, 1887, in Essex Record Office [ERO] and also ERO T/G 31, T/G 39/1 and T/G 52/3
ERO Q/RRp 2/8. The farmhouse was probably the one in the yard to the east of St Margaret’s church, as the present Stanford Rivers Hall was not built until about 1800.
ERO D/DP/L5
ERO D/DSd T19
ERO T/R 67/1 (transcript of parish registers)
ERO D/DP L5

Article 6 of 13

First World War Trunk returns to North Weald Station

A trunk which once belonged to Nellie Louisa Dawes (1902-1991) of Kiln Road, North Weald, has been donated by my family to the village station where her father was employed. Nellie left school at the age of 14 in 1916 to go “into Service”, at the same time as the Battle of the Somme raged and an aerodrome was being built nearby to bring down the Zeppelins.

We do not know to which large house she was employed but in all probability Nellie passed through the Station with her possessions on that day. The trunk was donated to the Epping and Ongar Railway in July and will be used in ‘dressing’ the booking hall of the station. In many senses the item has come home.

Nellie Louisa Dawes was my maternal grandmother.

Article 7 of 13

Private Victor Albert Burton

Member Doug Burton loaned me some WWI items concerning his great uncle, Victor Albert Burton, who lived with his parents at Foster Street, Harlow.

Victor who worked as a gardener joined the 1st Battalion, Essex Regiment. After his basic training at Warley Barracks, near Brentwood, (which was the depot for the Essex Regiment), he was sent with the 1st Battalion as part of the British Expeditionary Force fighting in France and Belgium.

Victor sadly died of wounds on the 25th September, 1917, aged 23 years of age, and is buried in Dozingham Military Cemetery. His name also appears on the Harlow Old Town War Memorial.

His brother Bert also served in the 1914-18 conflict, but survived the war.

Article 8 of 13

Never Mind The Dovecotes

When the speaker did not show at our June meeting, we had what turned out to be an impromptu history discussion among all present. It was one of those evenings you could not plan. As you know, the best impromptu talks take two weeks to plan. It was good to share our diverse taste in history. Our group discussion began with Copped Hall’s archaeological excavations and ended, I believe, with Michael Portillo and the cow that urinated on his shoes at the Padfield’s during the filming of ‘Great British Railway Journeys’

Conversation moved from the Battle of Waterloo and the Duke of Wellington, to Winston Churchill. On the way ‘Never Mind the Dovecotes’ was mentioned, being the National Trust album of Punk Rock tunes.

Dovecotes were used as a source of food – meat and eggs – as well as dung. A number of examples remain in Essex. The one at High House, Purfleet, dating from the late seventeenth century retains its nest boxes as well as the revolving ladder called a portence.
Donald Smith photographed and drew a number of Essex dove houses for his book 'Pigeon Cotes and Dove Houses of Essex', published in 1931. The original photographs are in storage at Colchester Museum.

Article 9 of 13

Epping Workhouse and the case of Mary Ann Reid

Epping Guardians Minutes - Minute of 21-8-1846
The following letter relating to the Case of Mary Ann Reid - received
from the Poor law Commissioners having been read to the Board was
ordered to be entered upon the Minutes.

Poor Law Commissioners Office. Somerset House.
1st August 1846

Sir,
I am directed by the Poor Law Commissioners to inform the Board of Guardians of the Epping Union that the Commissioners having received a Report from their Assistant Commissioner Sir John Walsham in which he has communicated to the Commissioners the facts as ascertained by him on the 10th ult when he in pursuance of their instructions held an enquiry into the circumstances of the case of Mary Ann Reid, who whilst an inmate of the Epping Union Workhouse was stated to have become pregnant and to have
given birth to a bastard child, which child died, and was buried in the
churchyard at Matching on the 22nd of April last without having been previously baptized - the main facts of the case as gathered from the witnesses examined by Sir John Walsham are the following

Mary Ann Reid aged about 32 years, who ‘tho deaf and dumb, has not any appearance of being an Idiot as alleged, was sent into the Workhouse between five & six years ago by her parents because according to her Mother's statement they could do nothing with her, from her being deranged in her mind after a bad fit of illness.

In the Workhouse Mary Ann Read was generally employed in household work from the time of her admission until it was known
that she was pregnant. Up to the 28th of April 1845 it appears to have been the custom in the Workhouse to ring a bell at 6 o'clock. p.m. in order that an inmate from each ward should go to the mouth of the coal cellar and receive the supply of coals required for consumption in each ward from that time until a similar hour on the following day. On the 28th of April and for some time previously, William Robinson who is above 60 years of age and who had been a Gentleman’s Servant, was employed in the Workhouse and amongst other duties he was required to hand up the coals from the cellar to the persons who came for them when the bell rang. Sir John Walsham informed the Commissioners that the coal cellar in question was in the Females Yard not at all out of the way, immediately accessible from the Union building and that the Master and Matron were continually in the habit of superintending the delivery of the coals themselves, and that the Inmates who had to fetch the coals were generally all together at such delivery. On the 28th of April however the Matron being engaged in the Kitchen, Mary Ann Read, who had to fetch some coals, and who happened to be the last person to whom coals were to be given out, was induced by Robinson to get down into the cellar and have connexion with him - She consequently became pregnant - and was ultimately delivered of a Bastard Child.

As regards the omission to baptize this child - a complaint which involves the conduct of the Chaplain as well as of the Master and Matron /in as much as it was alleged that the child had been long enough dangerously ill to have been baptized. Sir John Walsham reports that the Medical Officer was himself ill and could not attend the Enquiry when it was made, but it was shewn that the Medical Officer had seen & prescribed for the child on a Saturday for diarrhoea & that the child died on the Sunday Morning, there having been no previous reason to apprehend any danger at least not until 3 o'clock on the Sunday morning & then only by the Nurse /a relative/ who did not communicate with the Matron until after the death had occurred.

On a review of these circumstances the Commissioners have merely to observe that in the case of Mary Ann Read, her pregnancy took place under such circumstances as to warrant the Commissioners in acquitting the Officers of any blame on the ground of a want of ordinary vigilance: and in the case of Mary Ann Reeds child, the Commissioners likewise acquit the Officers of the Workhouse of any blame, because it seems that the Child died somewhat suddenly, that no danger was apprehended except at a short period before its decease and then no communication on the subject was made to the Matron or other Officers, who seem to have been aware what their duties are as regards the baptism of a Child who is known to be dangerously ill – the Commissioners have only to add that they think the Master may very properly request any Clergyman who baptizes a child in the Workhouse to give a certificate to the effect that the child has been so baptized, which should be produced at the funeral for the satisfaction of the Clergyman performing the service for the Burial of the Dead.
I am Sir
Your most obt Servant
E. Chadwick
Secretary

John Windus Eq
Clerk to the Guardians
Epping Union Secretary
From the Greensted Registers

A search of the registers for St Andrew’s, Greensted for Births, Deaths and Marriages can often reveal some interesting entries.

Nathan Lacy, the son of Nathan Lacy, Rector, and Sarah, his wife, was borne the seventh of March, Tuesday, about seven a clock in the morning, in Candlewick Street in London, and baptized the seventeenth in his Grandfather Hawes his house, by his father in the
yeere 1653.

Zachariah Shrapnel, son of the Revd W. Hamilton Warren, Rector of
this Parish, & Elizabeth, his wife, was born in this Parish April 2nd, 1796, five minutes after eight in the morning, upon a Saturday, & was afterwards baptiz'd at Bradford, in the County of Wilts, where his name is register'd.

Mother Milton, of ye age of 105, was buried 1 maij.1600.

John Gray & Zachee Pigot, drowned together, were buried together, 10th August, 1606, 4th Ja.

Richard Sweeting, of the parish of Greenstead, in the county of Essex, maketh oath that Susan Sweeting, of Greenstead, in the county of Essex, lately deceased, was not put in, wrapt, or wound up, or buried but in sheeps wool only, according to the act dated the 28 of may, in the two and thirtieth of yeare of the reign; &c., and was buried the same weeke anno dni 1680.

Thomas Piggot, who was unfortunately killed by an unruly Horse on the first was buried on the third day of July, 1735. And Affidavit made & brought in due time of his having been buried in woollen only.
The Rev' M' William-Tredwell Bull, late Rector of this Parish, died October y 19th, & was buried Oct. 21, 1738, in the South Side of the Chancel (not far from the Door) in the Church-yard.

Samuel King, an Infant (from the Foundling Hospital), was Buried the
Thirtieth Day of January, 1760.

Sarah Warren, Daughter of the Revd W. H. Warren, Rector of this Parish, & Sarah Sindry, his Wife, was buried in the Chancel under the communion Table, April 5th, 1799, died April 2nd, aged 8 months.

Mary Smith Ord, Wife of Craven Ord, Esc'', of Greensted Hall, aged 39, was buried March 7*, 1804, in the Chauncel, close to the Door, in a Wall Grave, died March 1st.

Source Notes:

The case had been raised in a letter to the Epping Union on 8th May 1845, by the Revd. John Houghton, of Matching

Article 10 of 13

From the Greensted Registers

Article 11 of 13

World War II: If the Invader Comes

Member Martin Cearns found the following poster in the effects of his late father. It was issued during 1940 and gave advice to residents as to the action they should take if this country was invaded by the Germans.

It really conjures up images of Captain Mainwaring and the Warmington on Sea Home Guard.

Article 12 of 13

Mother and Son: Elizabeth Blount and Henry Fitzroy, born Blackmore

Two books closely related to the history of Blackmore have recently been purchased for the Library of the Essex Society for Archaeology and History. ‘Bessie Blount, Mistress of Henry VIII’ (told in the title of the book by Elizabeth Norton), a lady in the retinue of Catherine of Aragon, was sent in confinement to Blackmore Priory in 1519 where in the neighbouring house she bore his child, Henry Fitzroy (told in ‘Bastard Prince. Henry VIII’s Lost Son’ by Beverley A. Murphy).

This note unravels the research and establishes whether Henry VIII may have really “gone to Jericho”.

According to Beverley Murphy, the King’s affair with Elizabeth may have been brief and began following the pregnancy of Catherine in April 1518. “It is a sad irony that Katherine’s happy condition was probably the impetus for her husband to seek solace in the arms of Elizabeth Blount” (Murphy, 27). Elizabeth Norton disagrees, because as early as autumn 1514 Bessie had met the King: “without the birth of Henry Fitzroy, Bessie’s own affair would have probably gone unrecorded” (Norton, 119). The birth date of Henry Fitzroy is unclear other than he was six years of age in June 1525. About the time that Bessie was to become visibly pregnant Thomas Wolsey discreetly dispatched her to Jericho House in Blackmore, the home of the prior Thomas Goodwyn (Murphy, 30). “Bessie made her final appearance at court early in October 1518” (Norton, 131).

Wolsey was charged with taking an active interest in Henry’s illegitimate child: Blackmore was “sufficiently quiet not to rouse unwelcome gossip” (Norton, 133). Henry VIII is alleged to have been a frequent visitor to Jericho House and is said to have given orders not to be disturbed hence the expression used in Court, “He has gone to Jericho”. This has entered into local folklore fuelled by Philip Morant who used these words in his ‘History of Essex’ (1768) adding that the Priory was one of the King’s “Houses of Pleasure”. Subsequently historians have suggested that Blackmore Priory was dissolved in 1527 because of its immoral goings-on. From “the records of the dissolution … it does appear that the prior was somewhat more worldly than he should have been” (Norton, 134): its debts ran to one third of the annual income. But then if a future King lived there perhaps the debts were with some justification?

Henry VIII may have visited Elizabeth at Blackmore, contrary to the view expressed by Murphy. Bessie certainly did not resume her duties following the birth of Fitzroy (Murphy, 31) and there is no record of the King staying overnight (Norton, 134). But this should not suggest the King had nothing further to do with Bessie. Blackmore is relatively close to Newhall, Chelmsford, which was renamed Beaulieu in 1523, from where the King “set out to visit her. This is once again evidence that Bessie’s departure from court was not the end of the affair between her and the King” (Norton, 134). It is possible that she later had a daughter by the King around 1520 (Norton, 139) perhaps conceived in Blackmore (Norton, 151). Fitzroy’s biographer disagrees (Murphy, 32).

The King was delighted with the news of the birth of a son and whilst in Essex that summer might have held a formal celebration at the manor of Havering-atte-Bower (Murphy, 31). Cardinal Wolsey was named the child’s godparent, as he had been for his half-sister Mary, the only surviving child born of Queen Catherine, some three and a half years earlier. Although no christening records survive Wolsey’s absence from Court from 19 June to 29 June 1519 may have been due to his attendance at Fitzroy’s baptism probably at Blackmore. Could the font have been the place where the ceremony quietly took place?

Bessie Blount was married off to Gilbert Tailbois (or Tailboys), who hailed from a rich Lincolnshire family. This may not have happened as quickly as historians have suggested: the first record of marriage is recorded in June 1522 (Murphy, 33; Norton, 139). They may have married in April 1522 because “the king began to be conspicuously generous to Gilbert Tailboys” (Norton, 141).

Historians are again divided as to whether Bessie had any involvement in Fitzroy’s upbringing. Her biographer suggests “it seems probable that she would have retained custody of her son … perhaps playing a part in raising both Henry Fitzroy and Elizabeth Tailboys until her marriage in 1522” (Norton, 151).

Much admired and spoilt by Henry VIII, Henry Fitzroy was, by the age of six, created Duke of Richmond with the titles Earl of Nottingham and Duke of Somerset. This placed Henry Fitzroy in an honoured position because the title held precedence over all other Dukes except potential legitimate sons of the King. By doing so, Henry VIII had elevated his son’s position in society such that he would be a more eligible bachelor. By the age of eight Henry Fitzroy was Admiral of England, Ireland and Normandy but died in 1536, aged seventeen of tuberculosis. He was buried at Thetford Priory. Had he survived the course of English history could have changed and Fitzroy crowned Henry IX.

Source Notes:

Principal Sources:
Murphy, Beverley. A.. Bastard Prince. Henry VIII’s Lost Son (Sutton Publishing, 2001)
Norton, Elizabeth. Bessie Blount. Mistress to Henry VIII (Amberley, 2011)

Article 13 of 13

From the Papers

Chelmsford Chronicle 19 March 1794.

William West was executed for breaking into the house of Philip Martin, Esq., of Theydon Garnon, together with three accomplices (not yet apprehended) and stealing 2 gold watches, 70 guineas, 2 £20 and 1 £10 bank notes, with a quantity of silver plate and other goods value near £600.

He would not to the last make any confession tending to a discovery of his accomplices, though ably advised of the injustice respecting his obstinacy here, and warned of his consequent punishment hereafter. In other respects he behaved with decency, composure and seemingly with penitence. To see a man in the prime of youth making so ignominious an exit, shocks the feeling of the humane, but, were not the definitive laws of our county put into execution neither justice, property, or society could be supported.

Stamford Mercury 11 January 1729

On Friday last week Capt. Searle, of Epping, being with his son in the woods adjoining where he kept wild turkeys, heard some persons there, whom he suspected to have come hither to steal them; and in order to discover and apprehend them, ordered his son to go one way, while he searched another: The son was presently set upon, and knocked down by a fellow, who repeated his blows, as the other attempted to rise, and afterwards called to his companion by name, and told him, he had done young Searle’s business. The father was in hearing at this time, having drawn that way by his son’s outcry; both the rogues had made their way off, and Mr Searle carried his son home, whose skull was so fractured, that he died that evening. Capt. Searle knowing the person whose name he heard, got him secured, and he discovered the person who committed the murder, who is apprehended and sent to Chelmsford Gaol.

Ipswich Journal 21st February 1730

On Monday night, a gentleman coming from Ongar in Essex, was attacked by a single highwayman on Epping Forest, who took from him a watch, five guineas, and some silver, and after having cut his horses girts, he made off.

The same evening about seven, o’clock, a person whose wife is housekeeper to the Lord Vise Castlemain, going to see her, was attacked in his Lordship’s park, near his Seat in Epping Forest, by two foot pads, who robbed him of fifty pounds, and used him in a very barbarous manner, and went off undiscovered. It is remarkable, that he received the money but the day before, which gives great reason to suspect that the rogues were apprised of their booty.

Chelmsford Chronicle 17 January, 1783

Yesterday fortnight, in the morning, a farmer at Greensted Hall, near Chipping Ongar, in this County, was robbed of two £20 bank notes and near 80 guineas, at Holloway Down, near Woodford, by two footpads well armed.